Skip to main content

The Passion of Joan of Arc (1928)

There's as much going on with the performers' faces in The Passion of Joan of Arc as with the whole human body in other films.  With the refusal to match eyelines and the spatial incoherence of every scene in which she's interrogated, it doesn't seem like the people in this film really see each other.  But with the range of emotions that can cross her face in a moment--fear, bitterness, confidence, comfort in God's presence--we see her sensitivity to everything that's happening, plus a great deal more that she brought with her into the courtroom.  Her face is often depicted against a blank background as the film cuts between her face and other faces, or objects around her.  There aren't always eyeline matches, and when there are, the shot following at her face is usually at a bizarre canted angle.  It is usually very difficult to piece together the proscenium from a series of shots in this film.  The physical reality of what is happening, however, is palpable from the vividly captured textures in this film, and the sensitivity to everything that happens expressed in Falconetti's face.

The judges tell her she was deceived into believing God spoke to her.  Most of what the characters say in this film is a debate over this.  As in many of Dreyer's films, this is a film about a dialogue in which the speakers start asking each other unanswerable questions.  We can only judge their motives for speaking, not their words, and remain permanently unresolved about the truth.  Jeanne, however, does not.  She makes her own prophecy true, that she will be saved from prison and bring victory to France.  She is freed by her death, and she dies because she doesn't allow the dialogue that composes this film to end with an agreement between speakers, because an agreement over unanswerable questions would be a lie.  The film ends with crosscutting between the violent social explosion that takes place in the aftermath of her death, and her body burning at the stake.  The film keeps returning to her image after her death, the way it did before, and an omniscient intertitle tells us that she "the soul of France."

The film draws its words from the transcript of Joan's trial.  But dialogue is more than words.  We see the way Jeanne grips the cross at the end, her anguish at being denied mass, her brief moment of calm when she is finally permitted to take the Eucharist before her death.  It is not just her religious beliefs that matter to her, but her religious practices.  Going through certain motions with her body settles the energy we see carried in her face throughout the film. We also see her refusal to abandon men's clothing.  She has her own, more private practices that also reflect her relationship to God.
 
The significance of these practices is illuminated by historical details which aren't explicit in the film.  Unlike women's clothing at the time, the men's clothing Joan wears could be tied together in such a way that would make them difficult to remove.  Wearing men's clothes gave Joan a measure of protection against the jailers.  The judges' demands that Joan wear women's clothes are an attempt to assail her body.  
 
The aforementioned texture and sensitivity of the human body depicted in Jeanne's reactions to the judge's threats and arguments, combined with the many disorientations of this film, make it all the more surprising that Jeanne holds her ground for so long.  Her nervous system must be screaming at her to give in, and she only comes close when she signs a confession moments before the judges plan to execute her. 
 
What follows is a very strange sequence in which the film crosscuts between Jeanne having her head shaved for prison and a series of contortionist street performers outside among the crowd attending her trial.  When she sees a straw crown the prison guards mockingly placed on her head earlier in the film, she calls the judges to tell them that she lied in her confession only because she feared execution, and that she will now accept it.  The judges are not without compassion.  One even cries when he realizes she is going to die.  But they wouldn't dream of sparing her.  Jeanne's commitment to the truth and the judges' commitment to ensuring that the same incantations reliably produce the same results finally lead to the same conclusion, because together they make Jeanne's prophecy true: that she will be freed from prison and bring victory to France.  

She is committed to the truth, but again, the text used by the film is unresolved about what is true.  The truth is not discovered in this film, but we witness Jeanne's refusal of lies and inconsistency.  That's easy enough to accept on paper, but in practice it just isn't.  It isn't worth trying to phrase why.  You should just watch this film and observe the physicality of the human body and the sensitivity of the spirit, exposed in the expression of emotion, not only by Jeanne but by the judges.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Megalopolis (2024)

Some people think this movie will be reappraised in 10 or 20 years, but as far as I can tell those people have not yet offered a good reason to believe this, except maybe that by then cinema as a whole will have degraded to a point where Megalopolis stands out.  Maybe when the time comes, I will see if anyone has something different to say.  Many of the film critics I follow or film fans I talk to have an auteurist streak, so it's only natural they would be interested in Francis Ford Coppola's vision of utopia.  Still:  "Transcends all categories of good and bad"  "Francis Ford Coppola has never been freer"  "the product of a delusional romantic"  "the work of an artist who has absolute faith in cinema's power to create emotionally affective images purely through his own force of will" These are all quotes from basically positive reviews of the film, some from fans posting their comments online and some from my favorite film critics....

The last 3 months: October-December 2024

The header image is from Ne Zha 2 , which came out a few weeks ago and is now the highest grossing non-English language movie ever.  (It's the seventh highest period.)  The movie is not bad.  It's certainly better than the first Ne Zha .  I don't have that much to say about it, and you've definitely seen similar movies before.  But it's worth seeing.   What I find interesting about it is how similar it is to the other movies that made $2 billion.  Its scale and spectacle put it in the same camp as the Avatar movies.  What I wonder now, though, is if in ten years the list of highest-grossing movies will be dominated by movies like Ne Zha 2 , mass market movies made for an audience of over a billion people.  I'd like to see if it's the audience or the formula that made the difference.     A Touch of Sin (2013) This film gave me a new appreciation for filmmakers who make similar films over and over again.  Jia Zhangke isn...

The TSPDT Poll 2021

For those who don't know, TSPDT decided to poll the general public about the greatest films of all time.   I submitted a list, which I'll share here: Angel's Egg (Mamoru Oshii, 1985) Awaara (Raj Kapoor, 1951) Barravento (Glauber Rocha, 1962) Beau Travail (Claire Denis, 1999) Black Girl (Ousmane Sembene, 1966) Duel to the Death (Ching Siu-Tung, 1983) Foolish Wives (Erich von Stroheim, 1922) Goodbye, Dragon Inn (Tsai Ming-Liang, 2003) Grand Illusion (Jean Renoir, 1937) Hellzapoppin' (H.C. Potter, 1941) Johnny Guitar (Nicholas Ray, 1954) Monsieur Verdoux (Charlie Chaplin, 1947) October (Sergei Eisenstein, 1927) The Passion of Joan of Arc (Carl Theodor Dreyer, 1928) Peking Opera Blues (Tsui Hark, 1986) Playtime (Jacques Tati, 1967) Sambizanga (Sarah Maldoror, 1973) Spirited Away (Hayao Miyazaki, 2001) Spontaneous Combustion (Tobe Hooper, 1990) Swing You Sinners! (Dave Fleischer, 1930) Tale of Tales (Yuri Norstein, 1979) The Tale of the Princess Kaguya (Isao Takahata, 201...