Skip to main content

Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984)

Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind shows us a desolate and inhospitable world, one much like those of other sci-fi action movies of the 80s which depict post-apocalyptic or alien worlds.  

The early scenes of this film depict Nausicaä's procedural knowledge.  She shows us how to work things, a way of living in this strange world.  Her methods give the world texture.  The same goes for the different outfits and styles of the people from different nations. 

In particular, she's good at handling agitated people and nonhuman animals.  Teto bites her finger when she reaches out to it, but she remains calm until he realizes she isn't a threat.  She treats the baby Ohm and Pejite warriors the same way.  

The Ohm are gigantic bugs with tentacles, dozens of sharp legs, and several rows of opaque, featureless eyes.  They move in layered segments.  Nausicaä respects them, and it's through her that we come to understand that their dignity.  Nausicaä's unwavering compassion bothers some viewers, but the core of this film is the connection between the depth of her commitment and her understanding of the world.  In Diary of a Country Priest, the title character shows his absolute openness by accepting a misbehaving child; Nausicaä shows something similar by showing generosity to alien creatures.

The Tolmekian soldiers who invade the Valley of the Wind try to maintain control over the populace but are forced to loosen their grip to keep the Valley in a habitable state.  The film's primary villain, Kushana, attempts to use the Giant Warrior against the Ohm but fails because it took too much to get off the ground.  In Nausicaä, doing anything big is difficult and awkward, whether it's farming, building, or waging war.  None of it would work without special beliefs and values that bind people together.

This is why the depiction of specific, material details of its world goes hand in hand with the film's mythic dimension.  The people of the Valley of the Wind have a prophecy of salvation, and the film ends with death and resurrection.  For the most part, the film presents us with a world on a hopeless, deterministic trajectory.  Count how many times characters say "we have no choice."  The film follows this trajectory to its conclusion, only to reverse when everyone finally comes face-to-face with something that shakes them.

It happens twice.  First, there's the apocalyptic image of the thousands of glowing red eyes marking out the Ohm stampede.  It's an image powerful enough to break the Tolmekian soldiers' will.  Then, there's Nausicaä's miracleSome might see it as a cop-out but what it really is is a demonstration: it takes a kind of renewed mythology to overcome all the other interpersonal forces at play in this film.  Again you could compare it to Diary of a Country Priest, where the priest's openness is ultimately what lets him receive the divine.  Nausicaä is able to achieve a spiritual renewal because she's willing to see spirit in bugs and trees. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Megalopolis (2024)

Some people think this movie will be reappraised in 10 or 20 years, but as far as I can tell those people have not yet offered a good reason to believe this, except maybe that by then cinema as a whole will have degraded to a point where Megalopolis stands out.  Maybe when the time comes, I will see if anyone has something different to say.  Many of the film critics I follow or film fans I talk to have an auteurist streak, so it's only natural they would be interested in Francis Ford Coppola's vision of utopia.  Still:  "Transcends all categories of good and bad"  "Francis Ford Coppola has never been freer"  "the product of a delusional romantic"  "the work of an artist who has absolute faith in cinema's power to create emotionally affective images purely through his own force of will" These are all quotes from basically positive reviews of the film, some from fans posting their comments online and some from my favorite film critics....

The last 3 months: October-December 2024

The header image is from Ne Zha 2 , which came out a few weeks ago and is now the highest grossing non-English language movie ever.  (It's the seventh highest period.)  The movie is not bad.  It's certainly better than the first Ne Zha .  I don't have that much to say about it, and you've definitely seen similar movies before.  But it's worth seeing.   What I find interesting about it is how similar it is to the other movies that made $2 billion.  Its scale and spectacle put it in the same camp as the Avatar movies.  What I wonder now, though, is if in ten years the list of highest-grossing movies will be dominated by movies like Ne Zha 2 , mass market movies made for an audience of over a billion people.  I'd like to see if it's the audience or the formula that made the difference.     A Touch of Sin (2013) This film gave me a new appreciation for filmmakers who make similar films over and over again.  Jia Zhangke isn...

The TSPDT Poll 2021

For those who don't know, TSPDT decided to poll the general public about the greatest films of all time.   I submitted a list, which I'll share here: Angel's Egg (Mamoru Oshii, 1985) Awaara (Raj Kapoor, 1951) Barravento (Glauber Rocha, 1962) Beau Travail (Claire Denis, 1999) Black Girl (Ousmane Sembene, 1966) Duel to the Death (Ching Siu-Tung, 1983) Foolish Wives (Erich von Stroheim, 1922) Goodbye, Dragon Inn (Tsai Ming-Liang, 2003) Grand Illusion (Jean Renoir, 1937) Hellzapoppin' (H.C. Potter, 1941) Johnny Guitar (Nicholas Ray, 1954) Monsieur Verdoux (Charlie Chaplin, 1947) October (Sergei Eisenstein, 1927) The Passion of Joan of Arc (Carl Theodor Dreyer, 1928) Peking Opera Blues (Tsui Hark, 1986) Playtime (Jacques Tati, 1967) Sambizanga (Sarah Maldoror, 1973) Spirited Away (Hayao Miyazaki, 2001) Spontaneous Combustion (Tobe Hooper, 1990) Swing You Sinners! (Dave Fleischer, 1930) Tale of Tales (Yuri Norstein, 1979) The Tale of the Princess Kaguya (Isao Takahata, 201...