Skip to main content

Johnny Guitar (1954)


Johnny Guitar opens with a man passing between two explosions.  On one side of him, a railroad company dynamites the hills, and on the other, bandits fire their guns robbing a stagecoach.  One of these activities is thought to advance civil society, and the other violates it.  But to this one man, both explosions are dangerous. 

Johnny Guitar is a wandering guitar player hired by a woman named Vienna. She runs a saloon out in the desert, some distance away from a frontier town, intending to build a town of her own when the railroad comes in.  Two prominent and domineering townspeople, McIvers and Emma Small, incite the rest townspeople against Vienna.  They have an apparently stable life on the frontier, but their response to Vienna reveals the fault lines on which they rest.

The American western often takes place in the wide-open lands of the west and focuses on a group of people who have ambitions for those lands--at the expense of the indigenous people living there, but that's not always in the spotlight.  But in Johnny Guitar, Vienna's attempt to build a new life for herself is not a journey into the frontier, but a matter of ownership.  She worked to own her own saloon, planning to seize the value created by the coming railroad, without ever capitulating to the local bankers and landowners.  There is no riding away from the old life, no retreat into new land; there is only struggling over the many odd instruments of value.  Johnny says he doesn't want to hear about how Vienna struggled to obtain "every board, brick, and beam" of her saloon; she says she wants him to listen, and to know.

Beneath the laws of ownership that Vienna, McIvers, and Small are fighting over, there lie currents of human emotion.  They hold everything together and they can destroy it all.  Late in the film, when the townspeople's rage boils over, Johnny warns her that all bets are off.  

Still, Vienna hopes they can build something new.  The way she treats her employees and anyone she calls a friend is totally different from the imperious, brow-beating way McIvers and Small treat the townspeople.  

This takes imagination, which can be beaten down.  When Vienna tries to make Johnny face reality, she reveals she has given up on some of her hopes.  Suddenly Johnny becomes a poet, using his words to illustrate a fantasy he thinks might restore them.  

But this comes right after Johnny asks Vienna, "lie to me," asking for empty words to make him feel better.  There's a boundary between comforting lies and things that can seriously be hoped for.  The film has an artificial, surreal quality that keeps us in tension as the characters try to find this boundary.  Vienna's saloon pops from the screen with its red walls and green card tables, while Vienna's own private room, painted white, looks like it belongs in a different building entirely.  Vienna herself changes outfits throughout the movie, sometimes in ways that barely make sense, and she always wears striking, bright colors.  

Late in the film, the townsfolk promise Vienna's friend Turkey he won't hang if he scapegoats Vienna.  Many characters in this film find themselves persuaded by far less legitimate threats than the one they pose in this scene.  But he looks at Vienna and says "what should I do?"  Their relationship is strong enough for him to ask this question, to not give in immediately to impulse.  It's another point of tension: Turkey has won a personal victory by keeping his nerve, but it seems to change very little about his fate.  

On the other hand, things turn out better for Johnny and Vienna.  If there is a difference between the lies Johnny asked Vienna to tell him and the fictions he tells to Vienna, it's in the intention and the spontaneity behind what they're saying.  Words alone are cheap; the relationships underneath are what's really important.  Maybe things didn't turn out all bad for Turkey when they turned out OK for people he was related to.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Megalopolis (2024)

Some people think this movie will be reappraised in 10 or 20 years, but as far as I can tell those people have not yet offered a good reason to believe this, except maybe that by then cinema as a whole will have degraded to a point where Megalopolis stands out.  Maybe when the time comes, I will see if anyone has something different to say.  Many of the film critics I follow or film fans I talk to have an auteurist streak, so it's only natural they would be interested in Francis Ford Coppola's vision of utopia.  Still:  "Transcends all categories of good and bad"  "Francis Ford Coppola has never been freer"  "the product of a delusional romantic"  "the work of an artist who has absolute faith in cinema's power to create emotionally affective images purely through his own force of will" These are all quotes from basically positive reviews of the film, some from fans posting their comments online and some from my favorite film critics....

The last 3 months: October-December 2024

The header image is from Ne Zha 2 , which came out a few weeks ago and is now the highest grossing non-English language movie ever.  (It's the seventh highest period.)  The movie is not bad.  It's certainly better than the first Ne Zha .  I don't have that much to say about it, and you've definitely seen similar movies before.  But it's worth seeing.   What I find interesting about it is how similar it is to the other movies that made $2 billion.  Its scale and spectacle put it in the same camp as the Avatar movies.  What I wonder now, though, is if in ten years the list of highest-grossing movies will be dominated by movies like Ne Zha 2 , mass market movies made for an audience of over a billion people.  I'd like to see if it's the audience or the formula that made the difference.     A Touch of Sin (2013) This film gave me a new appreciation for filmmakers who make similar films over and over again.  Jia Zhangke isn...

The TSPDT Poll 2021

For those who don't know, TSPDT decided to poll the general public about the greatest films of all time.   I submitted a list, which I'll share here: Angel's Egg (Mamoru Oshii, 1985) Awaara (Raj Kapoor, 1951) Barravento (Glauber Rocha, 1962) Beau Travail (Claire Denis, 1999) Black Girl (Ousmane Sembene, 1966) Duel to the Death (Ching Siu-Tung, 1983) Foolish Wives (Erich von Stroheim, 1922) Goodbye, Dragon Inn (Tsai Ming-Liang, 2003) Grand Illusion (Jean Renoir, 1937) Hellzapoppin' (H.C. Potter, 1941) Johnny Guitar (Nicholas Ray, 1954) Monsieur Verdoux (Charlie Chaplin, 1947) October (Sergei Eisenstein, 1927) The Passion of Joan of Arc (Carl Theodor Dreyer, 1928) Peking Opera Blues (Tsui Hark, 1986) Playtime (Jacques Tati, 1967) Sambizanga (Sarah Maldoror, 1973) Spirited Away (Hayao Miyazaki, 2001) Spontaneous Combustion (Tobe Hooper, 1990) Swing You Sinners! (Dave Fleischer, 1930) Tale of Tales (Yuri Norstein, 1979) The Tale of the Princess Kaguya (Isao Takahata, 201...