Skip to main content

Hellzapoppin' (1941)

 A crew of people dressed as devils on a raised platform surrounded by large spikes, tormenting people with pitchforks and cauldrons.

Shitposting has always existed.

Hellzapoppin' was originally an immensely popular stage musical that ran on Broadway from 1938 to 1941.  It featured newsreel footage of politicians, electric buzzers under audience members' seats, acrobatic dancing, magicians, animals, fourth wall breaks, etc., and the show was altered freely.  For its creators, the vaudeville duo Ole Olsen and Chic Johnson, no joke was too lowbrow and no gimmick was too absurd.  It must have made the film look subdued, which is saying something. 

The film has a lot of the same things but also has something resembling a story.  It begins with a projectionist in a cinema loading the film into a projector.  The film-within-a-film depicts a group of well-dressed people descending an ornate staircase, singing "I had a vision of heaven, and you were there."  Then the staircase becomes a slide under their feet, explodes, and they all go careening down into hell.  

The way the film opens with brief imagery of wealth and seemliness and then violently discards it to literal hell has a similar irony to the opening of Gold Diggers of 1933.  That film starts with chorus girls dressed in gold, singing "We're in the Money."  They finish their routine, leave the stage, and we learn the Great Depression is in full swing.

After the explosion, a devil pulls a curtain down with a disclaimer: "Any similarity between HELLZAPOPPIN' and a motion picture is purely coincidental."  The curtain goes up, and we see "hell," where devils sing, dance, cartwheel, jump and flip midair while tormenting the condemned, who are chased with pitchforks, stuck on rotisseries, and sealed in big metal drums labeled "Canned Guy" and "Canned Gal."  The devils sing: "anything can happen and it probably will!"  They're right. 

Another explosion happens and a taxi appears.  A devil opens the door and an impossible number of farm animals pour out, dragging Olsen and Johnson behind them.  They start breaking the fourth wall, speaking to us and to the projectionist, demanding that he rewind the film.  We then find out that all this has been taking place on a film set: the director stops the action to complain about how nonsensical it is.  

This is where we start to learn what is supposed to be the film's premise: Olsen and Johnson are making a film adaptation of their Broadway production.  That said, even the world of the studio, outside the film-within-a-film, is surreal.  When the director reviews headshots and test footage with Olsen and Johnson, the actors' pictures and recordings come to life and converse with them.

As they piece their film together, Olsen and Johnson enter the world of the film and try to manipulate its events.  At many points it becomes muddled whether they're filmmakers or characters in the film they're making.  They know the trajectory of the script and have the power to make almost anything happen, but they talk and act as if the characters were real people, and they control the course of events by physically moving objects and people around.  They are motivated more by sympathy for their own characters than any sense of obligation to the studio.

The studio demands that the film have a coherent story, and what they're making appears to be something like Busby Berkeley's 1943 film The Gang's All Here.  At least, it's supposed to be, but Olsen and Johnson mock and upend the conventions of Hollywood musicals, and some other genres, and in the end, offer an almost completely random series of jokes while the story's narrative logic becomes increasingly paradoxical.

The only unifying reason for all this is a sort of desperate creativity, a fascination with craft and tools that translates into Olsen and Johnson's overflow of ideas for gags, satirical commentary, and visual experiments with film stock and the motion picture camera.  One of the greatest dance sequences in cinema, maybe the greatest, is the highlight of this film, performed by Whitey's Lindy Hoppers, the only performers besides Olsen and Johnson to carry over from the stage production to the film.  The level of skill they display, the enthusiasm of the performances, especially by Martha Raye and Mischa Auer, and the creativity of the film's imagery belie the randomness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Megalopolis (2024)

Some people think this movie will be reappraised in 10 or 20 years, but as far as I can tell those people have not yet offered a good reason to believe this, except maybe that by then cinema as a whole will have degraded to a point where Megalopolis stands out.  Maybe when the time comes, I will see if anyone has something different to say.  Many of the film critics I follow or film fans I talk to have an auteurist streak, so it's only natural they would be interested in Francis Ford Coppola's vision of utopia.  Still:  "Transcends all categories of good and bad"  "Francis Ford Coppola has never been freer"  "the product of a delusional romantic"  "the work of an artist who has absolute faith in cinema's power to create emotionally affective images purely through his own force of will" These are all quotes from basically positive reviews of the film, some from fans posting their comments online and some from my favorite film critics....

The last 3 months: October-December 2024

The header image is from Ne Zha 2 , which came out a few weeks ago and is now the highest grossing non-English language movie ever.  (It's the seventh highest period.)  The movie is not bad.  It's certainly better than the first Ne Zha .  I don't have that much to say about it, and you've definitely seen similar movies before.  But it's worth seeing.   What I find interesting about it is how similar it is to the other movies that made $2 billion.  Its scale and spectacle put it in the same camp as the Avatar movies.  What I wonder now, though, is if in ten years the list of highest-grossing movies will be dominated by movies like Ne Zha 2 , mass market movies made for an audience of over a billion people.  I'd like to see if it's the audience or the formula that made the difference.     A Touch of Sin (2013) This film gave me a new appreciation for filmmakers who make similar films over and over again.  Jia Zhangke isn...

The TSPDT Poll 2021

For those who don't know, TSPDT decided to poll the general public about the greatest films of all time.   I submitted a list, which I'll share here: Angel's Egg (Mamoru Oshii, 1985) Awaara (Raj Kapoor, 1951) Barravento (Glauber Rocha, 1962) Beau Travail (Claire Denis, 1999) Black Girl (Ousmane Sembene, 1966) Duel to the Death (Ching Siu-Tung, 1983) Foolish Wives (Erich von Stroheim, 1922) Goodbye, Dragon Inn (Tsai Ming-Liang, 2003) Grand Illusion (Jean Renoir, 1937) Hellzapoppin' (H.C. Potter, 1941) Johnny Guitar (Nicholas Ray, 1954) Monsieur Verdoux (Charlie Chaplin, 1947) October (Sergei Eisenstein, 1927) The Passion of Joan of Arc (Carl Theodor Dreyer, 1928) Peking Opera Blues (Tsui Hark, 1986) Playtime (Jacques Tati, 1967) Sambizanga (Sarah Maldoror, 1973) Spirited Away (Hayao Miyazaki, 2001) Spontaneous Combustion (Tobe Hooper, 1990) Swing You Sinners! (Dave Fleischer, 1930) Tale of Tales (Yuri Norstein, 1979) The Tale of the Princess Kaguya (Isao Takahata, 201...