The film alternates between two frame stories which both involve hearings. One is to renew J. Robert Oppenheimer’s security clearance and one to confirm Lewis Strauss (pronounced “Strawss,” he insists) as Secretary of Commerce. Near the start of Strauss’s hearing, a senator makes a reference to “the Oppenheimer affair.” It’s clear that the hearing about Oppenheimer’s security clearance is a McCarthyist kangaroo court. But their only question which fazes Oppenheimer is their most genuine: why did Oppenheimer, the father of the atomic bomb, turn around and become an opponent of hydrogen bombs? The film opens with intellectual montage. This is always thuddingly obvious, but that's not a problem when it's as effective as it is here. In this movie, the montage is motivated largely by Oppenheimer's subjective experience. Oppenheimer imagines the mysterious reality behind the world we perceive; Oppenheimer visits a museum and examines Pic...
"We are in the world, not against it." - Ursula K. Le Guin